Crimitism

Cut off my toes to spite my feet

Who Wotches the Wotchmen? (analysis of gender-bending webcomic)

Posted by Richie on March 19, 2007

I’ve actually been meaning to write this for a while, but it’s difficult to talk about without it looking like “Hey, check out this fucked-up comic for perverts“, or, worse, that I’m transphobic. Which I’m really, really not. So it’s important to state now, before I get started, that this is specifically about the way the concept of being able to change gender at will (essentially) is used in The Wotch. I think what it says about gender identity vs. gender roles is applicable elsewhere, or else I wouldn’t have bothered writing it. This isn’t an attack on The Wotch, even though it’s obvious that I have problems with certain aspects of it, but if I’m talking about it specifically because there are so many webcomics out there with transgender content, all of which handle it differently, and if I get any more general then I risk misrepresenting them. And this isn’t even about transgender, anyway.

To give you a brief idea of The Wotch, here’s a recent panel that should explain everything:

The Wotch is a comic where men get magically transformed into women an awful lot, and sometimes get turned back again. They also get turned into statues, centaurs, mannequins, humanoid foxes and articles of clothing, but those are rarely part of the actual plot in the way male-to-female transformations are. Of the two male leads, at least one, probably both, are going to end up female during each story. If the comic was just an excuse for showing men turning into women, it wouldn’t be worth looking into, but the fact that time is given over to the male-turned-female lead characters living their lives as another gender makes it potentially interesting as a way of examining gender roles.

Quick plot synopsis: 15 year old Anne Onymous (ha) is a “wotch”, which is like a witch, except… Well, it’s like a witch. She’s got magical powers, anyway. Her classmates Robin and Jason share her secret. Wackiness ensues, usually involving Robin and Jason turning into their female alter-egos Robyn and Sonja for some, or all, of the story. There’s also some obtuse background mythology about an inter-dimensional war, but that’s not important right now.

Turning into somebody else is one of the standard tropes of magic-realist kids fiction (Freaky Friday, The Hot Chick, It’s A Boy/Girl Thing, episodes of Sabrina the Teenage Witch and Lizzy McGuire, Big, countless others), forcing adolescents and children to experience the world from another perspective and learn to respect the people in those positions. The key difference between the examples I cited and The Wotch, though, is that the change was involuntary (or at least they didn’t realise the magic whatsit was real) and that protagonists were stuck with the consequences. They’ve got to adapt to their change of circumstance without knowing how long it’s going to last, or if they can ever restore normality. The characters in The Wotch, on the other hand, can casually change gender and age (but mostly gender) whenever they feel like it, as long as Anne is there to cast a spell. Robin isn’t too bothered by this, and Jason actively enjoys it - they can, after all, just turn back into teenage boys later on, so why get fussed about it? Given the hormone-soaked environment of high school, wanting to experience how the other gender lives is understandable, especially if you can opt out when you choose. It’s never suggested that gender identity is the issue here, or that these characters are transgendered; they just like occasionally spending time as girls.

It’s here that the problems begin. As girls, previously male characters engage in stereotypical girl things. They hang out at the mall, they try on clothes, boys hit on them, they have slumber parties, they show off their bodies, they have “girls’ nights out”, they gossip etc. Yeah, whatever. But after the spell is reversed, they never do anything like this again… until the next time they’re turned into girls.

Because, you see, that’s what girls are for.

A comic where the main characters swap gender throughout looks like a great way of deconstructing gender stereotypes, but The Wotch is actually stiflingly conformist in its adherence to traditional male / female roles. All “feminine” behaviour is the exclusive domain of women, and if a male character wishes to engage in any, they have to literally become a woman in order to do it. Instead of taking what they learned during their time as women and applying it to their lives as men, they act in pretty much the same way as they always did, only changing their behaviour if their gender happens to change as well. Keep in mind that we’re not talking exclusively sexual things here - wanting to be a woman to experience what it’s like to date a straight man; that makes sense. Wanting to be a woman so you can socialise in a non-aggressive way, or go shopping for clothing, or feel attractive, or be emotional… Yes, you can see the problem here. I understand (from personal experience) that teenage boys are under an incredible amount of pressure to avoid falling into “feminine” behaviour patterns, so I can see why a comic like The Wotch would provide escapism for cisgendered boys who feel constrained by gender roles. But, by intrinsically linking gender roles with a person’s physical gender, isn’t it actually being counter-productive? Isn’t it feeding the same ideas that created the dichotomy to start with?

(It does have transgendered readers as well, obviously. However, the gender-changing on display in the comic isn’t about being born in the wrong body and needing to be physically female to be a complete person, it’s about wanting to do “feminine” things and believing that only women are “allowed” to do them. Anne’s older brother Evan says as much, when he asks Anne to temporarily turn him into a three year old girl, because as a three year old girl, he can get away with eating cookies and playing dress-up all day, which he couldn’t as a 21 year old man).

There are no women in the comic who routinely become men. There are almost no women in the comic who become men at all, ever, and when they do, it’s “fixed” by the story’s end. Incidental male characters who become female, however, occasionally stay that way permanently, and it’s always viewed as an improvement, since, as women, they immediately become friendlier and more in-touch with their emotions, as if their whole personality is inherently tied to their gender rather than how they were socialised. One of the teachers is transformed into a teenage Japanese girl who enjoys slumber parties and being cute, and elects to stay this way when given the choice of turning back. Another teacher is transformed into a buxom blonde woman in a tight dress, even though he this has nothing to do with his original appearance and isn’t a “female version” of him. A group of bullying, sexist football jocks are hit by a spell and become a group of nice, supportive cheerleaders who talk about their uniforms and bust measurements. Even though their new roles, appearances and personalities are described as being part of the spell, the implications about gender roles are still there. They couldn’t have become nice, supportive, attractive, fun men, because being nice, supportive, attractive and fun isn’t what men do.

The last sentence is the wrong way around, actually. The belief that men can’t be nice and supportive makes it look like it’s attacking men, but it’s really placing women on a pedestal and assuming they must always be nice and supportive to each other all the time. The belief that all women have superhuman niceness, morality, intelligence, attractiveness, sensuality and self-control fitted as standard is a persistent one, but it’s got nothing to do with a sense of female superiority, it’s just there to make it easier to blame women for not living up to those impossible standards 24/7. Not that I believe the people behind The Wotch are thinking this consciously.

But there’s something else about masculinity in The Wotch. There are women in the comic who undertake stereotypically “masculine” activities - wrestling, for instance - but don’t need to become men in order to do it. Again, you can interpret this as women-are-the-best-so-nyah, but isn’t it just reinforcing the concept that “masculine” activities are the benchmark for normality, and therefore it’s alright for women to take part and prove they’re tough (as long as they stay attractive!!!), while “feminine” activities are lesser, and a man “lowering” himself to that level is wrong? This would seem to conflict with the whole point of the comic, but I think it’s the linchpin. The gender divide is burned into our brains from such an early age that, even in a fantasy comic seemingly specifically designed for people who feel frustrated by it, we still view a woman “acting like a man” as empowered and in control, but a man “acting like a woman” is… Well, it’s non-existent, to be honest. Only women can genuinely cross the gender divide and come to terms with masculine activities without it threatening their identity as women - they become “tough chicks” instead - but if a man wants to come to terms with feminine activities, it can only happen after his identity as a man is removed. After this point he can take on masculine attributes again, becoming “empowered”, but the feminine attributes will vanish when he turns back. It’s OK to be a girl, but not a sissy.

No, it’s not going to make a huge amount of difference in the long run, and I’m not going to seriously berate a webcomic about magical high school kids for not being a gender studies textbook. But, given total creative freedom and a premise tailor-made to undermine gender roles, The Wotch has still chosen to view them as essential and absolute, and entirely in keeping with the mainstream concepts of masculinity and femininity. I think that’s worth noting, as a sign of how far we still have to go.

8 Responses to “Who Wotches the Wotchmen? (analysis of gender-bending webcomic)”

  1. Matthew Says:

    I’m intrested in seeing what Anne herself thinks of this.

  2. Richie Says:

    Yeeessss… The reason for not linking to the actual site from this was that I didn’t want anybody associated with the comic to find it and get offended, or think that it’s some Something Awful-esque attempt to get people to attack them. Except the article’s now been featured on (so far) five other sites, so I guess it’s inevitable that Anne and/or Robin are going to read it. At least it’ll probably be less of a disaster than the time I criticised Quentin Tarantino.

    Look, just to preempt the kind of comments I’m expecting from Wotch fans: I’m not out to make fun of the comic, or call the quality of the writing or art into question - this isn’t a review of the comic itself. I also don’t think Anne and Robin are setting out with the intention of reinforcing gender stereotypes, or that they’re explicitly trying to be sexist. I just think the way that a comic in which characters have no fixed gender still resorts to traditional gendered behaviour is worth noting as an example of how deeply the concept is embedded in us. And, because it’s likely to be brought up, the fact Robin and Jason aren’t stereotypically macho when they’re boys doesn’t mean they aren’t still stereotypically male.

    I make a point of only moderating comments if they’re spam or trolling, but if I get flooded by Wotch fans and what they say can be answered by the above paragraph, then I’m not going to approve their comments for the sake of my sanity. If Wotch fans want to discuss it or tear it apart or whatever - which I have no problem with - then I’d prefer they did it on the Wotch’s forum.

  3. Anonymous Says:

    Hi, here via WFA.

    One of the things that confuses me about “The Wotch” is that all the boys-turned-girls are more curvaceous and “good-looking” than the girls-who-were-girls-to-begin-with, at least in the first several chapters (which is all I’ve read). I’m not quite sure what to think of that.

    It strikes me that transgender-themed comics end up pushing conservative views on gender roles as often as not. Consider Ranma 1/2’s implication that Ranma’s never as tough or competent as a girl as he is as a boy.

    My main reason for not reading the comic is that the art just doesn’t grab me, though, and that updates seem rather sporadic.

  4. Catchup LinkBlogging » Comics Worth Reading Says:

    [...] that he enjoyed one called The Wotch. Now today I’m pointed to an essay about its use of gender transformations and stereotypes. Some interesting things to think about [...]

  5. Richie Says:

    I’ve always meant to study Ranma 1/2 more closely. I read the first volume in high school, but never bothered pursuing it because Manga was a pain in the arse to get hold of when I was 14 and there were about a bajillion volumes.

  6. the Hathor Legacy » Blog Archive » I Read the Internets - 3/24/07 Says:

    [...] Meanwhile, Richie over at somewhat-new blog Crimitism has a post up about gender constructions in webcomic The Wotch: [...]

  7. Anne Onymous Says:

    Hello. I am the co-creator, author, and artist of The Wotch. I was pointed to your critique a few moments ago, and since I can’t seem to make further progress on my update now, I figured I should comment at least for the clarity of my own mind.

    While I am not here to pick a fight, and I do appreciate that your criticisms were worded in a well-meaning manner, I do have issue with your…issues.

    First of all, some admittances: I don’t write a lot of Female-to-Male transformations. This is a criticism I’ve heard before, and acknowledge. Perhaps that should have been the case earlier on. The reason that even though I’ve heard this and yet no change has happened is because it would be terribly artificial to just force that into the comic for the mere sake of equality in transformations. If the opportunity to do so arises that keeps in character and in-story, then certainly it will happen. There’s one character who is a girl, experienced being a boy, and enjoyed it quite a bit, but is afraid (currently) to admit this. But that’s an issue for another time.

    Also, perhaps I have given the impression that there are certain activities that are only okay to do “as a girl.” However, I do not believe I have done this to the extant that you are accusing me of. Jason enjoys being Sonja at the mall more not because only girls can have fun at the mall–in fact, the trio hang out a the mall often. But as Sonja, she just enjoys certain activities more. She checks out the female fashion stores. Could Jason check out the male fashion stores? Sure, but he doesn’t care about guy’s fashion. That’s not to say no guy could, and do, but for him in particular, this is not the case.

    A few other specific cases: Mingmei, the former Professor Sorgaz, chose to remain in his transformed state not because he was now a she, but because it was a second chance at a young life altogether. He was a lonely man, and now he had friends. In fact, after regaining her memories, Ming hass switched from long hair to short, and from a skirt to pants. Does this mean that anything, gender roles wise? Not really. She just is familiar with that clothing style.

    Prof. Madison’s feminine ego is busty. Is this meant to be a statement? No. It really isn’t. It’s just a fun character trait, and also a nod to the friend who inspired the character in the first place.

    The Cheer Girls are a unique circumstance. They were changed as a gag; literally throw away characters. But they happened to inspire a fellow author, who asked to flesh them out more. Well, okay. But to do that, we needed to remove people’s reason for thinking they would want to change back to the boys they were. So, back stories were came up with–stories that involved 4 boys who deep down didn’t want to be the bullies they had become. Was their only out becoming girls? No. Not at all. But this was the out given to them. Really, their being nicer and outgoing as females is a coincidence. If a different trigger had happened to these characters, perhaps they could have changed their ways completely as the boys they were. But that’s not where the story went.

    There are also characters like Ti’El and Glock. Ti’El was an alien who was given a female-humanoid body. She enjoys it. Is that a slam on the male gender? Really wasn’t intended to be. Ti’El just has that quirk. Her partner, Glock, acts exactly the same male and female, so being stuck as the latter doesn’t really bother her one bit.

    Evan’s liking of being Lilly is for the escapism of youth. The gender issue was originally a side effect at the time, and since then Lilly has become a real part of him, so he would not want to simply be a young boy. is this saying that only little girls can be free and fun? Nope. Not at all. Again, it’s just the way the story went.

    I’m not actively trying to explore gender issues, believe it or not. Not as much as people sometimes assume. It’s a recurring theme, sure. It’s an important part of some characters. I’ve made some mistakes in my presentation, but there are facts that are not being taken into account here, some of which I’ve shared, and some of which I honestly don’t feel I have to.

    I’m writing a fantasy-comedy-adventure comic. It often has my favorite subject of transformation as a recurring theme, particularly TG transformation, particularly Male-to-Female TG Transformation. In the end, though, it’s driven by characters and story, not by the subject of TG or transformation. It’s meant to be a fun, lighthearted time while still being something deep, character wise. If you feel I have failed in this, then I respect your opinion. I just disagree with it.

    Also, to the commenter who accused me of not being good at writing: have you read the comic? Or just this blog? I found your comment particularly insulting and dismissive. Webcomics may be a venture by amateurs, but in my opinion they are the true avenues of creativity these days. And to those who think that webcomic authors can’t write, I direct you to http://www.itswalky.com/ for a sci-fi epic that rivals the best out there in any media, or http://zebragirl.keenspot.com/ for amazing, character driven fantasy, or http://venusenvy.comicgenesis.com/ for a comic that DOES purposely tackle gender issues head-on (the author of which is both a real life TG and a fan of The Wotch, incidentally). I may be biased in this, but I have been enjoying webcomics far greater than “regular” comics these days. I suggest you open up your mind to accepting that some amateurs have surpassed the pros. I’m not saying I’m one of these–not by a long shot–but do not deny that it can happen.

    Thanks for your time.

    –Anne

  8. Richie Says:

    I don’t think that any of the things I’ve taken issue with are intentional on your part, and I don’t think you’re trying to push any kind of agenda. The Wotch plainly is intended as a fantasy escapism, and it would be stupid of me to criticise you for not taking gender issues 100% seriously.

    However, this is a blog about gender issues, and it’s what I’m going to focus on in the things I write - it’s a critique of that aspect, not the work as a whole. I think The Wotch is symptomatic of how we view gender roles in the 21st century. I also think this about virtually every TV show, movie, webcomic and print comic, but the fact The Wotch has a lot of gender-bending content that isn’t sexual in nature makes it an interesting case. I’m not trying to pick on you specifically, but if I talk about “TG Webcomics” then I’d implicate comics like Venus Envy and Triquetra Cats, which really are about TG issues, and that wouldn’t be fair.

    I’m not trying to be pro- or anti- your comic here, or call its value as entertainment into question. If I’m contributing to any stress on your part, then I’m sorry.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>