Crimitism

"The Ultimate Mangina" – standyourground.com

Your weekly dose of privilege, bullying and generally missing the point

Posted by Richie on April 5, 2007

I hadn’t visited Something Awful since I wrote about RapeLay a couple of months back on Ye Olde Blogge. Prior to that I’d avoided it for several years, because… I’m not a teenager anymore, basically. About an hour ago, a friend told me that, against all odds, the site was now even worse than it used to be. I had to see this first hand, since I didn’t think it was possible for Something Awful to become more of a shitfest, even purely theoretically.

The “good” news is that the J-List banner is gone, so they’re not actively promoting the sale of RapeLay and pedophilic hentai anymore. But remember, they were doing it ironically. They’ve also changed “Hentai Reviews” to “Awful Anime”, even though it’s still entirely hentai. I don’t know if that means they’re going to stop advertising reviewing hentai from now on or what; the fact they’ve changed it all now that J-List isn’t sponsoring them any more seems to imply that the section only ever existed to get money out of their misogynist fanbase. Or would, if I were cynical. Which I’m totally not or anything. All of this is basically irrelevant because I’m unlikely to be lured back for another year or so, by which time the site will just be a PHP script that randomly generates faux-ironic hatred for anybody who isn’t exactly like the target audience. TAKE THAT, WORLD!

There’s already been enough written about Kathy Sierra’s online harassment and the subsequent cancellation of her workshop at the ETech conference. Kathy herself writes about it here, there’s a Feministe post on it here, a Salon article here, and one on Computer World here.

Lowtax, the webmaster of Something Awful, has his own take on things. I was going to say “unique take on things”, but there’s precisely nothing unique about over-privileged fuckheads using their magic powers to dismiss and ridicule the experiences of others (ironically). I’m not going to link to it directly, for the usual reasons. The URL is http://www[dot]somethingawful[dot]com/d/hogosphere/internet-death-threat[dot]php, if you want to read the whole thing. In both style and content, it’s the exact same kind of shit that made me close my old blog down and move somewhere with comment moderation. And completely different readers.

Choice excerpts:

“wah wah, I’m a big baby and this big baby uses the internet”

Can somebody please explain to me how is this news? Is getting death threats from anonymous people on the internet some incredibly new and fresh phenomenon sweeping the globe by storm? Up until March of 2007, were all internet users kind, courteous, eloquent pinnacles of human perfection?

Nobody was murdered. No crimes were committed. The same thing that’s been happening on the internet for two decades has happened yet again.

You get the general drift. Lowtax repeatedly attacks Sierra for not just shrugging off continuous and increasingly brutal threats of sexual violence, since – hey! – Lowtax doesn’t let irate Insane Clown Posse fans get to him. Because, you know, obviously these two experiences are the exact same thing. He also attacks anybody who’s written about the incident for making a mountain out of a molehill, as if the thrust of the articles has been “Somebody told a blogger to die OMG!”, rather than, ooh, “An online campaign of coordinated sexual harassment, threats of violence and intimidation has forced a blogger cancel a public appearance because she genuinely fears for her safety.”

Oh Lowtax, Lowtax, you silly little thoughtless halfwit. There isn’t a single prominent female blogger out there who doesn’t get told she’s a whore who needs to die all the fucking time. They already have thick skin. It’s a minimum job requirement. Sierra wrote about the relationship between users, technology and the brain, yet still found herself the target of gendered abuse which was totally irrelevant to her actual arguments, simply because she was female. Keeping the content of Sierra’s blog in mind, it’s also massively disingenuous of Lowtax to say “But I get abuse too!”, since, although Sierra said some contentious things, Something Awful intentionally sets out to piss people off, and has sections like “TruthMedia” that only exist to generate abusive emails. His situation isn’t remotely comparable to Sierra’s, but why miss a golden opportunity for hypocritical bullying masquerading as social commentary? It’s what the fans want, after all.

But, no, the entire thing is the fault of Sierra and anybody who’s angry that, no matter what women do online, men are going to use the advantage of anonymity to undermine them – consistently – because they happen to be women. As far as he’s concerned, it’s a non-issue and a beat up, since it’s not going to directly affect him, his writers or his target audience. Does he even know what people actually said and did to Sierra, or did he just hear “blogger” and “death threats” in the same sentence and reflexively fire off the usual “satirical” salvo of derision, bigotry and ostensibly zany non-sequiturs?

I present to you old media idiots inarguable proof demonstrating that goofy bitchy broad has absolutely nothing to whine about in her blogoriffic blogorama. I give you an email death threat against my two-year old daughter.

“I can’t be insensitive about death threats because my daughter got one” lines up to join “I can’t be sexist because my girlfriend says I’m not”, “I can’t be racist because some of my friends are black” and “It’s not homophobic when I say ‘faggot’ because I know a faggot who’s totally cool with it”, amongst other passengers on the next train to Lame Excuse City, pop. seemingly limitless.

Collateral damage. Remember those words when I fly to Lee’s Summit, kick in your door, duct tape Lauren Seoul’s mouth, fuck her in the ass, and toss her over a bridge.

This was the latest death threat I’ve received, a little nugget of insanity written by “Mark Pomerantz,” a guy kicked out of the University of Colorado at Boulder, a man absolutely furious I banned him from our forums. Yes, that’s correct, somebody is threatening to rape and murder my two-year old daughter because he was banned from an internet forum. At the risk of sounding like a psychologist, I’m going to climb out on a limb here and claim this person isn’t exactly grounded in reality.

Again, lunatics flaming you with “I’m going to rape and murder you / your family” is the standard experience for most prominent female bloggers, and they don’t even have to ban people to “deserve” it. No, Mark Pomerantz probably isn’t going to rape and kill Lowtax’s daughter. He’s just a frustrated troll. This isn’t what happened to Kathy Sierra. Even if this was what had happened, why does “Everybody on the internet does it” make it a non-issue, precisely? Threatening anything female with sexual violence is OK because all the other kids are doing it, and most of them don’t really mean it? If she takes it too seriously, it’s her fault for being thin-skinned, but if it turns out to be genuine, then I’m willing to bet it’d still be her fault for ignoring the warning signs.

So how is some “blogger” receiving a death threat national news? This isn’t anything unique or revolutionary or even interesting; your position as a public figure is directly proportional to the amount of people who will despise you. Some folks loathe me because I earn money running a comedy site containing the greatest writers and forum members on the internet. Such jealousy forces people to lash out in any way they can, desperately trying to hurt or get under their target’s skin any way possible, as long as it does not require leaving their chair. The result? Yet another internet death threat.

It’s easy to shrug off hate mail if you’ve got an army of drones hanging on your every word and buying your merchandise. It’s easy to be thick-skinned about what you do if your site gets millions of hits and your writers get invited on TV shows. It’s easy for men to ignore threats of sexual violence, because men don’t have a 1 in 4 chance of being sexually assaulted in their lifetime. Other people don’t have these things to fall back on.

Lowtax, every time you blame the victims for reacting to online abuse in a way you wouldn’t, you condone and encourage what people did to Kathy Sierra, and what they’ll continue to do in the future. Considering this is how you make money, I’m not at all surprised. Just cut the bullshit and stop trying to take the moral high ground.

What happened to Kathy Sierra wasn’t flaming born of jealousy, and wasn’t a bunch of trolls making fun of her. She already had that happening. What she went through was a coordinated, deliberate campaign of abuse, occurring on other tech blog sites with a similar profile. They put real effort into it. They described raping, beating and suffocating her, in detail. They Photoshopped her head next to a noose and said they were going to hang her. They said they were going to slit her throat. They mocked up an image of her being suffocated with her underwear. They worked on this together as a community. An entire community dedicated to intimidating and demeaning her. They also published her social security number and home address. She, meanwhile, had no idea who any of these people were.

This is not the same thing as getting flames like “I wish you were dead” or “I’m going to kill you, faggot” because you said something bad about Dragonball.

These were real threats. Even if the men on the other end never planned to go through with them, they were still real threats.

In Kathy’s words:

I now fully understand the impact of death threats. It really doesn’t make much difference whether the person intends to act on the threat… it’s the threat itself that inflicts the damage. It’s the threat that makes you question whether that “anonymous” person is as disturbed as their comments and pictures suggest.

It’s the threat that causes fear.

It’s the threat that leads you to a psychiatrist and tranquilizers just so you can sleep without repeating the endless loop of your death by:

* throat slitting
* hanging
* suffocation
and don’t forget the sexual part…

I have cancelled all speaking engagements.

I am afraid to leave my yard.

I will never feel the same. I will never be the same

Of course, none of this matters on Planet Lowtax. As far as he’s concerned, the issue here isn’t what Kathy Sierra went through, or that many, many other female bloggers have gone through the same thing, it’s that “old media idiots” are CRITICISING HIS INTERNETS!!!, specifically the parts where people enjoy casually throwing around hate speech. Like, you know, Something Awful.

Until I can precisely determine why a person receiving an internet death threat has been deemed “news,” I’ll continue to roll my eyes at the media’s fascination and confusion with the internet.

I wonder, Lowtax, if there was a group of anonymous guys Photoshopping pictures of your daughter asphyxiating, and describing in detail the way they’re going to murder her, over and over again, and those guys knew your address, would that only be worth rolling your eyes at?

I’ll give Kathy the last word on this.

Do not put these people on a pedestal. Do not let them get away with calling this “social commentary”, “protected speech”, or simply “criticism”. I would never be for censoring speech–these people can say all the misogynistic, vile, tasteless things they like–but we must preserve that line where words and images become threats of violence. Freedom of speech–however distasteful and rude the speech may be, is crucial. But when those words contain threats of harm or death, they can destroy a life.

EDIT: No, wait, I’ll give the last word to Something Awful’s forum.

If they just say “I’m going to slit your throat and jerk off into your throat hole” it’s just words.

Jesus, I’m thinking about killing her myself!

I think the main reason the media picked up on this, and I’m just saying this because I think so lowly of the media, is because she’s a woman.

Because nobody would have directed this kind of behaviour toward a man in the first place, maybe? NOPE! It’s because the media is just so biased toward women.

This comment, incidentally, came from Lowtax himself, who was just upgraded from “thoughtless halfwit” to “insufferable self-pitying contemptuous waste of flesh” in my personal estimation. Congratulations.

Try the “men who hate women on the web” link – these militant little people see sexism wherever they look, and frankly it’s absolutely disgusting.

This truly is amazing. A bunch of men threaten a woman with sexual violence, Photoshop her gagged with women’s underwear, repeatedly call her a slut, then threaten to tear off her head and cum in the wound. The only people who think sexism might be involved in this are, apparently, “people who see sexism wherever they look”.

Seriously, this deserves some kind of award. NASA should study it. We could eliminate fossil fuels if we learned to harness stupidity of this magnitude.

18 Responses to “Your weekly dose of privilege, bullying and generally missing the point”

  1. stormy said

    Lowtax, every time you blame the victims for reacting to online abuse in a way you wouldn’t, you condone and encourage what people did to Kathy Sierra, and what they’ll continue to do in the future.

    Words of wisdom.

    I noted too that the death threats he received were for the rape and murder of his daughter (not directly to him) so it does tend to show the sexist element. He personally wasn’t threatened, his ‘possession’ (daughter) was. Also he personally wasn’t threatened with anal rape (for that would make the personal making the threats ‘gay’ and ‘less of a man’).

    Feminist bloggers do not get the same type of death threats that male bloggers do, as many of the threats detail the rape, torture and murder of the blogger &/or her family.

    It is ‘a whole new level’ when the campaign is orchestrated, and obviously a great deal of effort and personalisation was put into the harassment and threats. Her picture was shown, she was scheduled to attend a publicised event, it was not over-reactionary for Ms Sierra to cancel the engagement.

    In many countries it is actually illegal to make death threats.

  2. Richie said

    It’s illegal in the US, too. The police took the threats seriously, but because they were anonymous and the sites were removed before they were archived, I don’t think the case is going to go anywhere.

  3. stormy said

    The sites would have had to be up and down within 24 hours then, most corporations (and hosts etc.) do backups every 24 hours, sometimes more frequently.

  4. Camryn said

    Awesome post. You completely nailed the lack of logic at work in this situation.

    “Because nobody would have directed this kind of behaviour toward a man in the first place, maybe? NOPE! It’s because the media is just so biased toward women.”

    What I don’t understand is how certain individuals can talk themselves into believing any of this weird 1984 think in the first place. How can it not ring hollow? It boggles my mind!

    Thanks for a terrific analysis of the situation, in all its insanity.

  5. Grace said

    Hey Richie, only had time to read about half of this post as my battery is about to die and then i’m switching this baby off for the night, but I just wanted to say that Lowtax sounds like one of the most abhorrant people to ever [dis]grace this planet.

    Also, harassment and threats of harm are absolutely illegal here too and it now stretches to all media, including email, comments and text messages, therefore he is so wrong in saying that no crime has been commited.

    What was the point in him even passing comment on what happened to Kathy Sierra – what is there of consequence in relation to him? No he just wanted to cause a stink and publish his twisted outlook to the world, ie his readers who are probably going to take his opinions wholesale, assimilate them as their own and become secondary Lowtaxs. What a f**king hateful, bigot!

    I’m so glad you’re posting about these things Richie!

  6. Richie said

    I was just checking my stats and SA found it. Except I checked the thread and there’s no mention of it, so I’m guessing the link was deleted shortly after it got posted. Or something. It’s gone now, and hopefully it’ll stay gone. I’ve removed all references to my email address from here just in case. I really don’t need this kind of shit.

    his readers who are probably going to take his opinions wholesale, assimilate them as their own and become secondary Lowtaxs

    This is the real problem with sites like SA. “I can afford to be totally insensitive about X, therefore anybody who cares about X is just overreacting and we should make fun of them” is giving your readers a license to treat everybody like shit, regardless of whether or not you occasionally tut-tut about it. Of course Lowtax and his staff are on record saying that they “don’t condone” their readers launching attacks on other sites; their names and email addresses are plastered all over the place, and because of this we can hold them directly accountable. But when it comes to their thousands of readers, all bets are off, since they’re just a bunch of nameless, faceless cyberthugs who don’t have to answer to anybody.

    Urgh.

    And it’s the same attitude that informed the repulsive crap I ended up quitting my old blog over, even though the people involved seriously thought themselves superior to SA trolls. Straight white middle-class 20something men don’t have to worry about being raped, ergo anybody who takes rape seriously just needs to lighten up and stop being so damn sexist!

    What I don’t understand is how certain individuals can talk themselves into believing any of this weird 1984 think in the first place. How can it not ring hollow? It boggles my mind!

    This is when I stopped giving Lowtax the benefit of the doubt. I used to think he was just trying to be to funny and didn’t consider the ways in which his writing reinforced some pretty disgusting beliefs, since he also wrote his fair share of sarcastic video game reviews and absurdist comedy that didn’t seem to be pushing any kind of agenda. But, on the basis of that post, it looks like he genuinely believes in that whole “It’s so hard to be a straight white American male” crap, which makes him calling Sierra a “big baby” even harder to swallow. Truly the Fred Durst of online comedy.

    Also, new reader! Hi :D

  7. DR said

    I’m not so sure that Lowtax really does believe the “so hard to be a straight white American male” thing. That column was latest in a line aimed at exposing the ridiculousness of internet reporting in the general media (well… not so much exposing, more dead horse flogging really). While I do think Lowtax is kind of an ass (though it should be said I enjoy his forums, they’re quite fun), I can’t imagine he was anything other than exceeding badly misinformed and blinded by his distrust of the media on this issue.

    I mean, just the other day he was expressing incredulity that he had recieved complaints from several forum members that the insulting custom titles they had bought for another member, a victim of multiple rapes, had been removed.

  8. Richie said

    Yes, but you have to ask where the atmosphere in which people felt it appropriate to demean a rape victim came from in the first place. Could this gem have had anything to do with it?

    http: //www.somethingawful.com/d/news/rape-is-funny.php

    Actually, let’s search the SA archives for “Rape” and see what shows up:

    Rape is such a harsh term. I won’t dispute that rape happens and it’s bad, but every Canadian knows when a woman goes out on a date with a man she is entering into a verbal contract to be sedated and sodomized before the night is over.

    I promise not to rape you for your opinion if you promise not to rape my pets.

    go have sex with the guy because he probably put drugs in your drink and is going to knock you out and rape you (date rape, but still rape)

    Seriously though, someone needs to tell Jonathan Davis that childhood rape victims only get one cathartic release of emotional anguish. As near as I can tell he’s been milking the same childhood trauma for songwriting material for over 10 years now.

    There were something like 500 results, too, and that’s just for rape. Now, Lowtax and his writers can say whatever they want about this being “satire”, but for Christ’s sake, of course their fanbase is going to get the idea that it’s OK to make light of rape if the site publishes material like this. And his defense that this is just “what people do online” doesn’t cut it, either. I have, in my time, been involved heavily in about a dozen sizeable online communities, and none of them let this stuff happen, because the moderators – which, at one point, included myself – made it clear that this kind of behaviour wasn’t acceptable. It’s what people do on sites that let them do it. He could run a site where the forum never got to the stage where people are buying offensive custom titles for a rape survivor in the first place. He doesn’t.

    No, SA is not the only source of this kind of attitude on the internet. There will always be idiots sending barely-literate emails about how they’re going to kill you for not liking Final Fantasy 7 (I speak from personal experience). But validating the behaviour of online abusers by framing it as a battle for free speech against humourless old fuddy-duddies will encourage it, regardless of how flippantly you treat the issue.

    Also, this…

    I can’t imagine he was anything other than exceeding badly misinformed and blinded by his distrust of the media on this issue.

    …probably is true, or at the least the first part, since his “distrust of the media” involved him believing they cared more about women than men, which smacks of self-pity that borders on delusional. He could have read virtually any other article on Sierra and gotten the full story instead of “Blogger receives death threats, cancels workshop”, but apparently couldn’t be bothered doing a few minutes extra research before blasting Sierra and “the media” for not being as smart as him and his readers.

    But the problem isn’t whether or not he meant to marginalise Sierra and any other female bloggers who’ve suffered this kind of abuse – and Sierra isn’t the worst example by any means – it’s that he did. And he did it on an incredibly popular site that encourages flaming, abuse, total insensitivity to others and all-around bigotry because it’s “just a joke”. Best case scenario is that nobody was paying attention. Worst case scenario is that their attitude gets even worse. And there’s thousands of them.

  9. stormy said

    The “he doesn’t really mean it” and “it’s all a bit of fun” are tiresome camouflage for misogyny and other unhealthy attitudes.

    I hear them all the time.

  10. Sara no H. said

    And people wonder why feminists are such man-haters. What with paragons of masculinity like that…/grumble

  11. stormy said

    “Rape is such a harsh term.”
    WTF! It is not a ‘harsh term’ if one is on the receiving end.

    Idiots that say fallacies such as this need to experience the realities from the other side, that of the violation being done to them. I would bet they would then change their tone and attitudes fairly quickly.

    I am appalled that rape is now interwoven into video games as part of entertainment. Male violence and sexual violence is largely conditioning, not innate. If I believed otherwise, my strategy as a feminist would not be to try and change the attitudes of males and society, but instead develop a bio-chemical weapon that would target the Y-chromosome, killing the male of the species.

    Worldwide, millions of women (and children) are raped every day. Feminism does not create ‘man haters’, men do, by their actions. Rape is not sex, not sport, not entertainment, and certainly not a joking matter.

  12. nightgigjo said

    Seriously though, someone needs to tell Jonathan Davis that childhood rape victims only get one cathartic release of emotional anguish. As near as I can tell he’s been milking the same childhood trauma for songwriting material for over 10 years now.

    Yeah. Right. What a f**kwitted idea.

    I KNOW that’s not true. It’s taken me 10 years to *begin* to come to terms with my sexuality after I was date raped at 18. I can’t *imagine* the horrible trauma a child would suffer (and that’s only assuming there was one incident of rape).

    I’m glad that wasn’t actually posted by someone here. I’d have been SO tempted to castigate them publicly.

    Glad you caught the “HE wasn’t threatened with rape, his TWO-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER was”. Patriarchal privilege in action: The thought of threatening rape to a man is so preposterous that they have to threaten a toddler. *grrrrrrr*

  13. stormy said

    This is perhaps, what Lowtax should have written about Ms Sierra’s online harassment:

    The Guardian, Friday 6 April 2007:
    http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2051580,00.html

    How the web became a sexists’ paradise

    Everyone receives abuse online but the sheer hatred thrown at women bloggers has left some in fear for their lives. Jessica Valenti, editor of Feministing.com, reports

    Last week, Kathy Sierra, a well-known software programmer and Java expert, announced that she had cancelled her speaking engagements and was “afraid to leave my yard” after being threatened with suffocation, rape and hanging. The threats didn’t come from a stalker or a jilted lover and they weren’t responses to a controversial book or speech. Sierra’s harassers were largely anonymous, and all the threats had been made online.

    Sierra had been receiving increasingly abusive comments on her website, Creating Passionate Users, over the previous year, but had not expected them to turn so violent – her attackers not only verbally assaulting her (“fuck off you boring slut . . . I hope someone slits your throat”) but also posting photomontages of her on other sites: one with a noose next to her head and another depicting her screaming with a thong covering her face. Since she wrote about the abuse on her website, the harassment has increased. “People are posting all my private data online everywhere – social-security number, and home address – a retaliation for speaking out.”

    While no one could deny that men experience abuse online, the sheer vitriol directed at women has become impossible to ignore. Extreme instances of stalking, death threats and hate speech are now prevalent, as well as all the everyday harassment that women have traditionally faced in the outside world – cat-calls, for instance, or being “rated” on our looks. It’s all very far from the utopian ideals that greeted the dawn of the web – the idea of it as a new, egalitarian public space, where men and women from all races, and of all sexualities, could mix without prejudice.

    On some online forums anonymity combined with misogyny can make for an almost gang-rape like mentality. One recent blog thread, attacking two women bloggers, contained comments like, “I would fuck them both in the ass,”; “Without us you would be raped, beaten and killed for nothing,”; and “Don’t worry, you or your friends are too ugly to be put on the black market.”

    Jill Filipovic, a 23-year-old law student who also writes on the popular blog, Feministe, recently had some photographs of her uploaded and subjected to abusive comments on an online forum for students in New York. “The people who were posting comments about me were speculating as to how many abortions I’ve had, and they talked about ‘hate-fucking’ me,” says Filipovic. “I don’t think a man would get that; the harassment of women is far more sexualised – men may be told that they’re idiots, but they aren’t called ‘whores’.”

    Most disturbing is how accepted this is. When women are harassed on the street, it is considered inappropriate. Online, though, sexual harassment is not only tolerated – it’s often lauded. Blog threads or forums where women are attacked attract hundreds of comments, and their traffic rates rocket.

    Is this what people are really like? Sexist and violent? Misogynist and racist? Alice Marwick, a postgraduate student in New York studying culture and communication, says: “There’s the disturbing possibility that people are creating online environments purely to express the type of racist, homophobic, or sexist speech that is no longer acceptable in public society, at work, or even at home.”

    Last year I had my own run-in with online sexism when I was invited to a lunch meeting with Bill Clinton, along with a handful of other bloggers. After the meeting, a group photo of the attendees with Clinton was posted on several websites, and it wasn’t long before comments about my appearance (“Who’s the intern?; “I do like Gray Shirt’s three-quarter pose.”) started popping up.

    One website, run by law professor and occasional New York Times columnist Ann Althouse, devoted an entire article to how I was “posing” so as to “make [my] breasts as obvious as possible”. The post, titled “Let’s take a closer look at those breasts,” ended up with over 500 comments. Most were about my body, my perceived whorishness, and how I couldn’t possibly be a good feminist because I had the gall to show up to a meeting with my breasts in tow. One commenter even created a limerick about me giving oral sex. Althouse herself said that I should have “worn a beret . . . a blue dress would have been good too”. All this on the basis of a photograph of me in a crew-neck sweater from Gap.

    I won’t even get into the hundreds of other blogs and websites that linked to the “controversy.” It was, without doubt, the most humiliating experience of my life – all because I dared be photographed with a political figure.

    But a picture does seem to be considered enough reason to go on a harassment rampage. Some argue that the increased visibility afforded people by the internet – who doesn’t have a blog, MySpace page, or Flickr account these days? – means that harassment should be expected, even acceptable. When feminist and liberal bloggers slammed Althouse for her attack on me, she argued that having been in a photo where I was “posing” made me fair game. When Filipovic complained about her harassment, the site responded: “For a woman who has made 4,000 pictures of herself publicly available on Flickr, and who is a self-proclaimed feminist author of a widely-disseminated blog, she has gotten pretty shy about overexposure.”

    Ah, the “she was asking for it” defence.”I think there’s a tendency to put the blame on the victims of stalking, harassment or even sexual violence when the victim is a woman – and especially when she’s a woman who has made herself public,” says Filipovic. “Public space has traditionally been reserved for men, and women are supposed to be quiet.”

    Sierra thinks that online threats, even if they are coming from a small group of people, have tremendous potential to scare women from fully participating online. “How many rape/fantasy threats does it take to make women want to lay low? Not many,” she says.

    But even women who don’t put their pictures or real names online are subject to virtual harassment. A recent study showed that when the gender of an online username appears female, they are 25 times more likely to experience harassment. The study, conducted by the University of Maryland, found that female user-names averaged 163 threatening and/or sexually explicit messages a day.

    “The promise of the early internet,” says Marwick, “was that it would liberate us from our bodies, and all the oppressions associated with prejudice. We’d communicate soul-to-soul, and get to know each other as people, rather than judging each other based on gender or race.” In reality, what ended up happening was that, online, the default identity became male and white – unless told otherwise, you would assume you were talking to a white man. “So people who brought up their ethnicity, or people who complained about sexism in online communications, were seen as ‘playing the race/gender card’ or trying to stir up trouble,” says Marwick.

    And while online harassment doesn’t necessarily create the same immediate safety concerns as street harassment, the consequences are arguably more severe. If someone calls you a “slut” on the street, it stings – but you can move on. If someone calls you a “slut” online, there’s a public record as long as the site exists.

    Let me tell you, it’s not easy to build a career as a feminist writer when you have people coming up to you in pubs asking if you’re the “Clinton boob girl” or if one of the first items that comes up in a Google search of your name is “boobgate”. And for young women applying for jobs, the reality is terrifying. Imagine a potential employer searching for information and coming across a thread about what a “whore” you are.

    Thankfully, women are fighting back. Sparked by the violent harassment of Sierra, one blogger started a “stop cyberbullying” campaign. This was picked up by hundreds of other bloggers and an international women’s technology organisation, Take Back the Tech, a global network of women who encourage people to “take back online spaces” by writing, video blogging, or podcasting about online harassment.

    It won’t mean the end of misogyny on the web, but it is a start. Such campaigns show that women are ready to demand freedom from harassment and fear in our new public spaces. In the same way that we should be able to walk down the street without fear of being raped, women shouldn’t have to stay quiet online – or pretend to be men – to be free of threats and harassment. It is time to take back the sites.

    Perhaps Lowbrow should redraft?

  14. [...] to Something Awful was closer to the truth than I knew. Richie over at Criticisms has the scoop on Lowtax’s misogynistic and downright hateful response to the Kathy Sierra incident (warning: reading through that entire thread is downright [...]

  15. [...] viciously harassed and stalked is being minimized and dismissed, while Sierra herself is accused of overreacting and being unreliable. Because, much as I hate to admit it, the people who are engaging in the [...]

  16. Degero said

    I present to you old media idiots inarguable proof demonstrating that goofy bitchy broad has absolutely nothing to whine about in her blogoriffic blogorama. I give you an email death threat against my two-year old daughter.

    “I can’t be insensitive about death threats because my daughter got one” lines up to join “I can’t be sexist because my girlfriend says I’m not”, “I can’t be racist because some of my friends are black” and “It’s not homophobic when I say ‘faggot’ because I know a faggot who’s totally cool with it”, amongst other passengers on the next train to Lame Excuse City, pop. seemingly limitless.

    I stopped reading after this. You are saying that a death threat against a helpless two-year-old isn’t as bad as one against a full grown woman? Are you serious? Death threats are bad in any form but including a daughter is by far worse. If anything I would say that a random death threat to a woman who can take precautions to protect herself is better than one against a child where they would need to learn who that child even is.

    The answer you should have given was “Death threats are wrong.”

  17. Richie said

    No, I’m not saying that. I’m saying that ‘My death threat trumps yours, so nyah’ isn’t a valid argument, and Lowtax is only using it to dismiss the discussion and make Sierra look hysterical.

  18. Revena said

    Hint: don’t end a comment with an assumption/spurious request for clarification about what the author is saying when you’ve begun it with any form of the phrase “I stopped reading [your post].”

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>