Crimitism

Helpless slave to its psychic pterodactyl overlords.

Pronoun discussion goes slightly berserk; Gamers in internalised sexism shock

Posted by Richie on November 16, 2007

My memory is probably less than accurate because I haven’t played Dungeons & Dragons since high school, but as far as I recall, the most recently released books handled gendered pronouns in one of three ways:

  • Alternating between male and female pronouns throughout.
  • Explaining rules using examples involving the characters rather than the players, so Lidda the halfling has her equipment and her hit points, while whatever the half-orc’s name is has his strength score and his experience points.
  • Always using male pronouns, but with a disclaimer at the beginning about how it’s just a convenience thing and you can replace them with female ones in your mind (how magnanimous).

Games Workshop’s Warhammer books, true to their past form, don’t bother with any of the above and consistently use masculine pronouns without so much as a pseudo-apology. Given the relatively large number of women involved in both the company and the fandom, you’d expect them to at least put ‘being vaguely gender-inclusive’ somewhere down the bottom of their to-do list, but clearly most of their effort is going into finding new synonyms for ‘destroy’.

Somebody on a forum notices this. He jokingly points out that, if you take the rules absolutely literally, women aren’t allowed to play it. Embittered twit responds!

Ummm…. That would only be true if the English language, before being all politically-correctified, didn’t use masculine pronouns by default to mean ‘male and female’. Which it does. So I guess only _liberal_ females aren’t allowed to play.

Political Correctness = Anything that makes me question institutionalised prejudice. That this is still used today, as in example #3 above, doesn’t seem to matter. The masculine pronoun as default was changed because it was alienating and non-inclusive; it wasn’t fair prior to whenever the fuck political correctness was invented, and we’re presently dealing with shit that was published in 2007 anyway, so how things were doesn’t matter. On the basis of this, we should refuse to accept ‘anymore’.

Somebody else has a sensible suggestion.

You can just say ‘their’.

But, no.

You can, but the book doesn’t… It specifically says ‘his’. I mentioned it once to a female opponent, and she called me a sexist pig. Until I pointed it out in the book.

I bet her face was red, since everybody knows that your behaviour ceases to be sexist if there’s a precedent in a book about space elves.

Meanwhile, somebody who’s extended their literary horizons beyond the set texts makes an observation.

Most RPG rulebooks, and some of my criminal justice textbooks, refer to any player as “her”. Probably to make it seem less hostile to those of the feminine persuasion.

‘Probably’. This fact elicits the following reaction:

…… (shivers)

Yeah, imagine if RPG rulebooks were sexist.

Another sensible suggestion is made.

I believe that the proper way is to say “his or her”/”he or she” etc…

Another sensible suggestion is shot down by one of the thousand interchangeable people with ‘dominatus’ somewhere in their username.

The politically correct way. Not the proper way. Political correctness is… something I won’t bash for the sake of keeping this thread open.

Political Correctness = Acknowledging the existence of people who aren’t exactly like me. Considering the present state of the thread, I don’t think bashing whatever the hell political correctness is stands much chance of closing it down. Christ, it’s not like people were suggesting ‘herstory’.

Because I expect only the finest pedantry from wargamers, it takes slightly over a page for somebody to point out that…

Their is technically innacurate because it’s plural.

Which is true, although it’s basically acceptable and doesn’t confuse the meaning, unlike the inability of the staff writers to differentiate between ‘loathe’ and ‘loath’. Sadly, this post continues.

I knew a serious fem-nazzi in philosophy class back in the day, and she always made a big stink of this, then i pointed out that there is no possesive single case direct predicate in the english language, so we have to attach a gender… i’ll use his because i’m a him. and you use her’s because you’re a her.

Start To Feminazi: Less than three pages. Also, if you want to get pedantic about grammar, it helps to use capital letters sometimes.

Haha, good job on the front lines! *medal*

Why don’t women date geeks? 8(

Somebody says what everybody who isn’t a raging asshole is thinking.

grammar arguements are pointless, english language is a living language and it evolves to suit the speaker, it is a tool and hence can be used anyway the person sees fit. Without language developing we would all still speak in grunts so personally I’m all for bad grammar (and spelling) because it’s the future.

We could argue over the precise definition of ‘bad’ here, but he’s got a point. OR DOES HE?

True to some extent, yes. But taken to the extent that the use of ‘his’ is taken to mean ‘to the complete exclusion of the female population’ is ridiculous. No, the use of ‘his’ does not preclude women from playing Warhammer, and it is among the least of factors keeping them from doing so. Unless they are a femi-nazi, in which case, I don’t feel like playing them because they ruin my language. And any responses to this post from anyone who acts like aforementioned zealous feminists will be utterly ignored into oblivion.

He’s right; there are a lot of other reasons women are staying the fuck away from mainstream gaming, and he’s managed to demonstrate a fair number of them just in this post.

It was at this point (half way down page three) that I gave up because it was making me too depressed.

17 Responses to “Pronoun discussion goes slightly berserk; Gamers in internalised sexism shock”

  1. Isa Says:

    Ahh… This is sad! Christ… “Why don’t women date geeks? 8(” - well said.

  2. Richie Says:

    I went back and it actually got worse.

    Read 1984. The deterioration of the written and spoken language is a major threat to freedom.

    Remember, insisting on using masculine pronouns by default is a form of freedom.

  3. cellycel Says:

    Yeah - any changes to the English language. They be deterioration!

  4. Richie Says:

    I mean, surely these people aren’t so stupid as to miss the fairly glaring fact that “Masculine pronouns will always be the default and any women who happen to be reading can shut up or bugger off, PS. This isn’t sexist because we said so” has far more in common with Newspeak than the thing they’re actually criticising? Right? RIGHT?

  5. Laura Says:

    Were this a just world, starting a sentence with ‘Ummm…’ and then making any comment whatsoever on the English language would surely cause one’s head to explode with sheer irony.

  6. Richie Says:

    But this isn’t a just world, it’s an Orwellian nightmare where I can’t openly demean women without being forced to undergo soul-destroying psychological torture in a reeducation camp people sometimes sighing at me.

  7. Laura Says:

    Well, the two are practically indistinguishable. The logical solution to these problems, of course, would just be to use ‘she’ as the normative pronoun, given that women are a majority of the population. Although that would probably DESTROY CIVILISATION ITSELF.

  8. Richie Says:

    Undoubtedly; the leadership gene and the shopping gene are incompatible.

  9. tekanji Says:

    Their is technically innacurate because it’s plural.

    No! Wrong! The ignorance of the English language must stop O.O The singular they actually has a longstanding approval in the English language. From Language Log:

    Yet another epicene pronoun: Hu are we kidding? (see links)

  10. Richie Says:

    Now, now, you’re applying logic. We’re through the looking glass.

  11. purtek Says:

    utterly ignored into oblivion.

    Not just ignored. Utterly ignored. Into oblivion. I know *I* find that frightening. And it certainly convinces *me* that in refusing to use feminine pronouns, these people are in *no way* attempting to pretend I don’t exist or force me to conform to whatever they think.

    no possesive single case direct predicate

    If you want to get pedantic about grammar, it may also help to know what the hell these words mean.

  12. Richie Says:

    Unwisely, I checked it again, and now he’s throwing his English Minor around as proof that he can’t possibly be wrong about anything.

    They could easily change everything to “His or Her” in the books without upping the page count simply by removing some of Eye of Argon-quality breakout text. Lo, the Crimson Legion have been drawn to battle by the promise of slaughter!

  13. Jemima Says:

    Yep, the D&D books alternate the articles based on the gender of the character currently being used as an example. Likewise the Shadowrun books from FanPro/FASA use examples with male and female character as well as male and female players. There’s a lot of complicated calculations in that system, so it’s quite common to see examples such as “Derek’s character gets caught in the blast and he must roll… Kathy decides that she can use her character’s ability to help Derek’s character survive the attack.” Call of Cthulhu from Chaosium are among those who use both genders when choosing definite articles.

    Some game publishers have adjusted to more openly welcome female gamers, other have clearly not. Personally I’m not too bothered by it, I am so used to ‘he’ being used as a non-gendered article that I seldom think of it as male. I can easily be imagining a female character when the text is using he, and then in some cases when it was actually supposed to mean male rather than either gender I end up being very confused when the maleness of the character becomes relevant to the progress of the story or the explanation.

    One thing I always wondered, though, was why they don’t use ‘you’. “If you’re playing a mage, you can do so and so etc etc.” it’s non-gendered and it’s directed at the reader. Of course they’d have to rewrite all the texts, replacing ‘he’ with ‘they’ would be so much easier :P

    Oh and don’t even get me started on male players playing female characters. ARGH! Being a female I find it rather easy to play a male character. I think it is because I realise that men and women are not so different, especially not in a fantasy/sci-fi setting where gender roles can be abolished as we please. But normally I play my own gender, simply because if the GM or a fellow player decides to play on gender anyway, I won’t have to start defending “why I had my character to do so and so since that is obviously not what a man would normally do.” On the other hand I have seen male players play female characters and make them narcissistic bints who spend all their free time playing with their hair and fixing their clothes, when I questioned them about whether that’s all she does I got the response “Yeah, she’s a typica female.” and if I call them on the bullshit I get told I’m being silly. Oh yeah, and people wonder why so few girls are RP’ers and why those who are prefer to avoid most of the male populace of that particular hobby.

    /rant

  14. Richie Says:

    On the other hand I have seen male players play female characters and make them narcissistic bints who spend all their free time playing with their hair and fixing their clothes, when I questioned them about whether that’s all she does I got the response “Yeah, she’s a typica female.” and if I call them on the bullshit I get told I’m being silly.

    Yeah, this sort of shit used to happen all the time in my group. Once there was this massive argument over female characters shaving their legs while in dungeons, and how she’d have to use up one of her 0-level cantrips on a minor appearance altering spell to remove unsightly hair without wasting our valuable water supplies. I suggested that she could just wear pants, but was overruled because her beltskirt was both attractive and functional. Oh, and the character sheet said she “looks like the hot one out of The Donnas”.

  15. MaggieCat Says:

    Unless they are a femi-nazi, in which case, I don’t feel like playing them because they ruin my language.

    There are so many reasons that this is my favorite part. The fact that the entire purpose of language is to communicate with the general public, meaning that by definition it’s public property. The misuse of the generally accepted form of “Feminazi” making him look even dumber. The fact that apparently asking someone to make a slight modification to their pronouns is equivalent to world destroying fascism. (Okay, that last one may be the whole ‘my grandpa’s family left Germany just before Hitler came into power’ thing rearing its easily offended head again.) So much stupidity and entitlement worked into one teeny sentence, it’s a thing of wonder. As in I wonder how these people managed to live this long without someone at the very least smacking them in the head with dictionaries. No wait, that could actually explain a few things…

  16. Richie Says:

    It’s especially bleak because most of the guys on that forum are in their 30s and 40s, not a bunch of teenagers who could potentially improve.

  17. Jade Reporting » Back from Break: January 5, 2008 Says:

    [...] Pronoun discussion goes slightly berserk; Gamers in internalised sexism shock [...]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>