Is Anna Valarious the worst action heroine of all time?
Posted by Richie on July 2, 2008
Faux Action Girl
A supposedly modern heroine who, under closer scrutiny, doesn’t live up to her reputation. An Action Girl with very low standards you would never hold a male hero to: a Faux Action Girl. She’s established from the very beginning as a powerful, capable hero… and never does anything heroic. She has a well-grounded reputation as a strong fighter in her field… and always fails in the line of battle. Her talents and skills are well known to fellow characters but rarely if ever seen by the viewers.
Quoted from the TV Tropes Wiki. I assure you, escape is quite impossible.
“It’s nice”, says Kate Beckinsale of her character in the Van Helsing DVD extra features, “That she’s not just wearing a pretty dress and fainting. She’s not a damsel in distress”. Kate, you just filmed Underworld; why do you think this is somehow an abberation…?
In celebration of the release of Wanted (which, on the basis of the trailer, is Fight Club +Guns -Self Awareness), Rotten Tomatoes has listed the 25 best action heroines of all time. Yes, the first visible comment is somebody complaining that the list should have men on it as well, why do you ask? But as I am reliably informed by popular internet humour sites, not to mention Something Awful, being positive about stuff just isn’t entertaining. I therefore pose this list’s anti-matter universe duplicate: Who is the worst action heroine of all time? The one that immediately comes to my mind is Anna Valarious, Kate Beckinsale’s character from Van Helsing. This didn’t cross my mind the first few times I saw it (I bought it for $6 and believe in getting my money’s worth), since it’s bad in so many other ways that Anna’s utter uselessness becomes background noise amid lines like “Of course, this must be what happens when vampires mate…”. Yes, of course.
The thing about Anna is that the filmmakers are labouring under the delusion that she’s a modern action heroine who’s re-writing the rules of the action/horror genre by not being a damsel in distress. Problem one, as I mentioned above, the same actress had just been in Underworld, in which she got to slaughter vampires and throw herself off of buildings every five minutes. And Underworld‘s whole aesthetic was obviously influenced by The Matrix, in which Trinity was awesome enough to make the entire world go into slow motion while she kicked people in the face. Not to mention other movies which came out around the same time, like Resident Evil and The Fifth Element, had women beating crap up, and Buffy had just finished its run on TV. Oh, and Kill Bill. I don’t bring these up as proof that everything’s dandy when it comes to women in action movies, or that – to quote Roger Ebert – men have been “emasculated off the screen”, but to point out that the simple existence of women in action roles was an industry standard by this point, even if (as often happened) they weren’t treated very well by the narrative. In order to make them worthwhile, the movie has to actually do something worthwhile with them, and this is where we run into Problem 2: Despite the posturing and stunt work, Anna actually is a damsel in distress whose role in the plot is completely passive. I know, because I kept track. With a pen.
#1: ANNA VS. A WEREWOLF
As much as I appreciate closeups of Kate Beckinsale’s arse, there is a time and a place for these things, and it isn’t fighting a werewolf in 19th century Romania. Only, rather than actually fighting the werewolf, she just distracts it, causing it to fall into a cage which is the hoisted into a tree and shot at by everybody other than Anna, who just stands there doing nothing. There’s no reason for her not to have a gun, and you’d think it’d be advisable, what with the fucking werewolf, but she doesn’t. The werewolf then escapes and chases her – a gun would have been handy here – cornering her on a clifftop and leaving her defenseless until her brother rescues her. Almost as if she’s some kind of… damsel in distress. Her brother then heroically sacrifices himself to protect her, and then, as if to underline how useless she is, her response is to look miserable and ask for God to protect them, because obviously she can’t do it herself, having only a dozen riflemen and the capacity to make silver bullets at her disposal.
ANNA= 0
DUDES = 1
#2: ANNA VS. THE SEXY VAMPIRE BROADS
Van Helsing appears and offers help, to which Anna replies “I don’t need your help”, even though she explicitly asked God for help last scene. Either it’s just shit characterisation, or she’s putting on a tough act to impress people, in which case she’s useless and self-destructive. Three Sexy Vampire Broads then swoop down from behind her, but she’s saved by Van Helsing, just to make sure we know she does need his help, and that her prior attempt to disarm him was wrong and would have gotten her killed if he wasn’t all awesome and surly like. Her reaction to the ensuing chaos is to scream “Everybody inside!”, which is where everybody’s going anyway, but never mind. As Van Helsing protects everybody, she stands around doing nothing until she’s captured by a Sexy Vampire Broad and… rescued by Van Helsing, again. Who gets a face full of her crotch.
Anna spends the rest of the scene running around urgently, which, to the naked eye, makes it appear she’s actually involved in the fight. In actuality, she’s… just running around. After being capture by a Sexy Vampire Broad again, she stabs it in the foot! It drops her! Has Anna actually succeeded in doing something right? No! She’s immediately picked up by a different Sexy Vampire Broad and rescued by Van Helsing again. Van Helsing does this by shooting that Sexy Vampire Broad through the ankle as well, by the way, but he does it properly. In her one attempt to escape from the vampires without Van Helsing’s help, she hits her head on a tree and falls over.
To recap, she has to be rescued by Van Helsing three separate times in the one scene, and would have died (twice) if Van Helsing hadn’t refused to listen to her. He doesn’t need her help at any point, and all she does is cause problems for him. She’s not a damsel in distress, though! The DVD said so.
ANNA= 0
DUDES = 2
#3 ANNA VS. SEXY VAMPIRE BROADS (INDOORS)
Anna’s on her own and defenseless, like some kind of damsel in distress, because Van Helsing’s been knocked over by a vampire. “I hope you have a heart”, says Anna to an advancing broad, “Because one day I’m going to drive a stake through it!”. This doesn’t happen, of course, because Anna is rendered powerless by having her upper arm grabbed. Two broads then advance on Anna, licking their lips, getting us ready for some hot softcore girl-on-girl vampirism. Van Helsing saves her, though.
ANNA= 0
DUDES = 3
#4: ANNA VS. VAN HELSING
Anna prepares to go hunt Dracula, stocking up on as many weapons as her ridiculous corset will accommodate. Van Helsing’s having none of this, and sprays her with knock-out gas. According to the commentary track, the scene originally involved him knocking her out by punching her in the face. For her own good. Test audiences reacted badly to this, for some reason.
ANNA = 0
DUDES = 4
#5: ANNA VS. A DIFFERENT WEREWOLF
She actually has a gun this time, but the shot misses and Van Helsing saves her, the silly moppet.
ANNA = 0
DUDES = 5
#6: ANNA VS. VAN HELSING VS. A WEREWOLF VS. MORAL AMBIGUITY
The werewolf is actually Anna’s brother, so she stops Van Helsing from shooting it and it gets away. Van Helsing then shoves her up against a wall, starts choking her (Actual dialogue: “You’re choking me!” “Give me reason not to!”) and then says he’s going to kill her brother anyway. This is meant to make him into a dark, morally-ambiguous character, except moral ambiguity doesn’t work if the character ends up being right 100% of the time. Barging in to her life, ignoring what she has to say, knocking her out, choking her and trying to kill her brother are, as far as the movie’s concerned, justifiable actions, and he’s never called to account for them. That’s not ambiguous, it’s disturbing.
ANNA = 0
DUDES = 6
#7: ANNA VS. SOME DWARF THINGS
Anna gets to do something by kicking a gas mask-wearing dwarf in the face and knocking it into a vat of bubbling liquid. This is literally the first time she successfully defends herself in the entire movie, it’s seven fights in and the assailant is 3′ tall.
ANNA = 1 (!)
DUDES = 6
INTERLUDE: ANNA VS. AN ARGUMENT SHE HERSELF MADE ABOUT HALF AN HOUR AGO
Upon meeting Frankenstein’s monster, Anna wants to kill it, but Van Helsing protests that there’s good in him and he must be allowed to live. This is the exact same argument Anna made to him about the werewolf, but because the positions (and, alright, sexes) are reversed, we’re expected to side with Van Helsing and think Anna’s intolerant. Can’t you just smell the moral ambiguity…? (No).
#8: ANNA VS. SEXY VAMPIRE BROADS, AUTOSCROLLING CARRIAGE BONUS STAGE
Anna’s alone and cornered by a werewolf until a heroic dude leaps in the last second and saves her. This character is really developing!
ANNA = 1
DUDES = 7
#9: ANNA VS. CLICHE HELL
Anna is captured by vampires, put in a cleavage-enhancing ballgown and lusted over by Dracula, whom she is powerless to resist. Hang on… damsel in distress… pretty dress… fainting…
Van Helsing then swoops down on a chandelier and snatches her away at the last second. Yes, really.
ANNA = 1
DUDES = 8
#10: ANNA VS. ME-OW!
Oh, Christ, it’s a vampire catfight / Ye Olde Jelly Wrestlinge match in which Anna and the remaining Sexy Vampire Broad paw and sniff at each other. Anna does manage to drive a stake through her nemesis’ heart, making good on the promise she made at the beginning of the movie. She also promised to destroy Dracula, save her village and release her brother from his curse, but what were you expecting by this point?
ANNA = 2
DUDES = 8
ANNA: POST-MORTEM
Anna saves the day by injecting Van Helsing with anti-werewolf juice, only he’s mid-transformation at the time and ends up killing her. The final scene… God… The final scene is Anna’s face looking down from heaven and smiling at Van Helsing. The guy who just killed her. And killed her brother. And ignored everything she said. And knocked her out and choked her when she wouldn’t do what she was told. For her own good. Yyyyyeeessss.
According to my results, Anna was a useless damsel in distress 80% of the time, standing up for herself a grand total of twice during the movie, even though she’s sold to us as a modern action heroine. This is not an opinion, it is a verifiable scientific fact, so nyah. Consider that another vampire movie form forty years ago managed to have a far more pro-active heroine without contriving to make her into a 19th century ninja, and you realise that something’s gone horribly wrong. Take away the posturing and the wirework, and you’re left with a character who belongs in something half a century earlier.

Patrick said
While I absolutely love Van Helsing (any movie which starts in black and white with a torch-bearing mob and Dr. Frankenstein crying “It’s alive!” makes me happy), you’re quite right about how innefective Anna is despite the filmmakers’ claims.
Two bits you missed out on: When our heroes realize that all of the attendees as the masque ball are vampires, Anna grabs a flail and prepares to fight them… at which point Van Helsing grabs her by her Standard Female Grab Area and pulls her away. So she’s even willing to fight an entire castle full of vampires, and only avoids that certaibn death because Van Helsing knows better than her (as always).
Second, while she does succeed in killing Aleera, it’s only because of the intervention of comic sidekick Karl tossing her a stake. So the only bad guy that she kills all on her own is a 3′ tall Dwergr. I think Karl has a better fight record than that.
Richie said
Oh God, it’s worse…? At least I can refer people to your comment next time I’m accused of “Looking for things to complain about”.
joankelly6000 said
If I call it re-claiming and inspired-by-feminism, is it okay for me to mention that this post made me swoon?
Richie said
…..Yes.
Pages tagged "surly" said
[...] bookmarks tagged surly Is Anna Valarious the worst action heroine of all … saved by 3 others mikeb998 bookmarked on 07/02/08 | [...]
Karen Healey said
God, Richie, you make me so happy in my insides.
Richie said
And that makes watching Van Helsing worthwhile!
Torri said
oh god I knew that movie was horrible, but take a pen and paper to keep records and it manages to be even worse!
Richie said
He’s apparently doing the GI Joe movie next. I was going to say something about him ruining Lady Jaye, but I’m reading Wikipedia right now and she’s not actually in it. Wait, horrible realisation dawning. There were three female leads in the GI Joe cartoon. Jaye was the tough, husky-voiced one with a sensible haircut. She’s the only one not in the movie. Oh CHRIST, and Covergirl, who originally DROVE A TANK, is now the general’s personal assistant. And I can’t even blot it out with alcohol, because I depleted my reserves last night trying to make the Doctor Who finale tolerable.
Darkly Lurking said
Before reading this, I had no opinion on the matter. However now I am convinced that Anna Valarious is, indeed, the worst action hero of all time.
Since writing that time has passed and another contender has risen in my mind – Catwoman.
Please note I have not seen this movie – but I have not seen Van Helsing either and that doesn’t stop me having an arbitary opinion.
Torri said
Darkly Lurking- Catwoman is NOT an action heroine, villain-anti-hero at best but she is not a heroine.
That… THING that they made a movie of and called it Catwoman…
never was never will be Selina Kyle…
(no I don’t have any issues about that movie at all XP I never actually watched it because it looked so terrible. But yeah I get the feeling you weren’t referring to Selina Kyle either ^^; )
wiggles said
What’s the “Standard Female Grab Area?” Is that like the scruff of the neck? I’ve noticed this too in these heroine-who’s-really-a-damsel movies. The dudely rescuer will often pick her up and move her with one hand as if she’s a poorly-placed desklamp.
Richie said
The action movie standard female grab area is just above the wrist, a little-known pressure point which renders women completely helpless even if their other hand is holding a gun or they can melt things with their mind.
Darkly Lurking said
Torri – apologies for dragging up such painful memories – I should have been more clear. Not proper Catwoman, no, no. Bad new horrendous-looking movie Catwoman!
Ha – although I do love that neither of us have seen us but are happy to join in disclaiming it from our soapbox of superiority!
After all, if I stuck to posting responses on topics I knew about, I would be reduced to forums about ensemble studios games, steven seagal movies and australian football.
shannon said
I’m so glad that you mentioned my new obsession- the tv tropes wiki on your blog.
Woman said
The action movie standard female grab area is just above the wrist, a little-known pressure point which renders women completely helpless even if their other hand is holding a gun or they can melt things with their mind.
Yeah, I know, it’s really inconvenient that men put our off switches there. I’m always shutting myself off when my arms are full, when I give people hugs, or when I reach into tight places. I had to start wearing a watch because it’s very disconcerting to come back online and not know how long I’ve been shut down.
Noli Irritare Leones » Blog Archive » Faux Action Girls, and other links of the day said
[...] Is Anna Valarious the worst action heroine of all time? I haven’t seen the movie, but one point leaps out at me, in Crimitism’s detailing of why Anna is a “Faux Action Girl”: the Standard Female Grab Area. As Richie explains further, when questioned in the comments: The action movie standard female grab area is just above the wrist, a little-known pressure point which renders women completely helpless even if their other hand is holding a gun or they can melt things with their mind. [...]
Greentonic said
I’d like to nominate Electra from Daredevil for second.
Sheryl said
Wow, and I thought that she was a lame character and poor excuse for a heroine before I saw this post (which is great, by the way). The movie has a special place in my heart, though, because it is the only movie I know of in which the hero kills the love interest by smooshing her to death.
Overseer76 said
Daredevil’s Electra doesn’t fit for me. She kicked his butt twice in that movie. I think Daredevil himself is a better choice. Not only does he totally lose to Electra (the second time), but he immediately and ill-advisedly goes after Bullseye at the church — an encounter he barely survives — only to then race across town to have it out with Kingpin himself despite being punctured, beaten, disoriented by sonics and any other physiological insult I may have forgotten. Daredevil’s only claim to fame come the end of that movie was his sheer endurance.
Aeshna said
What I didn’t like about Anna is that she wore pants in a milieu where women didn’t wear pants. She also happens to be in a milieu where women basically didn’t do anything so this seems to be historically inaccurate. Not to mention that she seems to act like the boss of everybody; that would have felt degrading for a man. (Correct me if I’m wrong about these things.) It doesn’t help that the main thing that made Anna interesting is her hotness, not actual skills or smarts.
The points you pointed out about Anna suddenly made me realize how much I have been overlooking.
I like Van Helsing only for its action, although it turned out to be a shameless fanfic that disappointed a Dracula fan like me.
Megan said
Elektra is that quasi-brilliant female character whose purpose is to be found skilled, intelligent, and beautiful, and then quickly relegated to love interest. Difficult to criticize because neither of these things are exactly bad, but yet occur too often to female characters to completely overlook as innocent.
It is unclear in the film if she won that scuffle with Daredevil. I think she tricks or distracts him and thereby wins — which hardly has the potency of a true, full-on victory. Then, of course, she is murdered — which, again, is dramatic and exciting and essential to the movie, yet still is unsatisfying for its prevalence. Plus, the whole way in which he wormed her name out of her was rather invasive — follows her, harrasses her, grabs her, mocks her . . . all while being charming, of course, with that manly, sexual, cocky grin of his.
Perhaps it is not so bad as that, but she, despite being skilled (not skilled enough to actually win), does not acheive anything.
bellatrys said
What I didn’t like about Anna is that she wore pants in a milieu where women didn’t wear pants. She also happens to be in a milieu where women basically didn’t do anything so this seems to be historically inaccurate.
Well, European clerics fighting vampires and demons with crossbows and such is historically inaccurate, so that’s a bit of balking at gnats while gulping down camels whole.
But there’s a whole genre of Women Wearing Trousers And Being Secret Heroes in folksong and folklore going back to antiquity, and some of it is based on reality, so saying it’s historically inaccurate to have women in breeches roles (even tho’ it was illegal until the 20th century in America) and doing active things is, well, historically inaccurate, for fiction or for reality.
Google Polly Oliver, Mary Ambree, The Female Smuggler, and Sovay just to start with. Oh, and also prolly the most famous of the Cross-dressing Ballad Girls, Jackaroo. (Not to mention all the cross-dressing heroines more or less successful in Renaissance cult authors Shakespeare and Ariosto.) Then you could go on to reading about the women who really did crossdress and go for soldiers and doctors and so on, like the Chevalier d’Eon, Deborah Sampson, Lt. Harry Buford, and never leave google again…
pants said
Thank you, Bellatrys.
See, the thing is – a hell of a lot of what we “know” (read: think we know) about medieval women is plain and simple nonsense. Like, it’s wrong as hell. One of my closest friends studies medieval literature as a career and – guess what? Victorian revisionism sanitised or edited out everything that didn’t synch up with the age’s notions of what men and women were supposed to do or not do. What most people think they know about medieval women’s lives is utter malarkey. For the most art, a medieval noblewoman was running the manor because the noblemen were out defending their turf. Peasant women worked as hard as the men day in and day out – and so did their children, male and female. As for the plain stupid notion that any/all medieval women were illiterate? Ha ha, Anchoresses were literate. Nuns were literate, A lot of women were semi-literate – one would have to be if one was a widow and owned one’s own land. Yes, that did happen, and it wasn’t rare.
This revisionist junk is why people think Chaucer pulled characters like the Wife of Bath out of his ear. So all these people bleating ‘women had no rights anywhere at all! women couldn’t read! there was no such thing as a literate woman anywhere ever then! blah blah blah blah blah! women were only property! bloo blah blee bluh blah! capslock! indignant fuss!’ in response to ANY suggestion to the contrary are unfortunate victims of the Victorian era’s tendency to censor and sanitise the living pants off of anything and everything (I assume everything they cut out went into inspiring their porn, because it’s amazingly out-there). If you read ‘Dracula’ and look at Harker’s assumptions as to what the women of olden days did with their lives? That’s pretty much what Victorian society touted as the whole truth of medieval women’s lives.
It’s completely inaccurate. It’s tacky, sappy, stupider-than-stupid romanticised drivel that peole should know better than to assume to be the gospel truth. And It’s often obviously the product of people’s creepy gender essentialist fantasies and wishful thinking when it’s brought up. I really wish it would expire. I mean – doing one’s homework is not that diffcult. Reach Chaucer. Read literature form the period. You will learn from it!
Me, I’m fortunate enough to have a friend who can tell me just how much of a doofus I’m being when she’s fact checking my wannabe-medieval-setting fiction for relative accuracy. She’s the reason I know any of this at all.
Now I shall stop being a ravingly pedantic arseholess and leave this over here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanne_Hachette
that guy who left a comment` said
In regards to #6 didn’t they establish the fact that the human part of Anna’s brother was gone and the thing left in his place was a snarling, murderous beast who was completely under Dracula’s control BEFORE their first encounter with him? My memory of “Van Helsing” is a lil’ fuzzy.